Files
foto-duplicate-finder/README.md
T
SoftwareApp 3581ffc6bb Add a generated demo photo library for store screenshots
The results screenshot is a screenshot *of a photo library*, so the committed
capture showed the developer's own photos. tools/make-demo-photos.py draws the
library instead: 22 procedural scenes (sunset, mountains, beach, conifers in
haze, dunes, city skyline, night sky, bokeh) with grain and a vignette, so there
are no people, no third-party content and nothing to license.

The duplicate structure is deliberate, because a folder of unrelated pictures
demonstrates nothing:

- headline group: one scene re-saved at falling quality and size until its
  reclaimable size reaches --target-mb (45 MB). Results are ranked by
  reclaimable bytes, so this group has to out-rank whatever is already on the
  device or a real photo is the first thing back in frame.
- exact pair: two byte-identical files, for the SHA-256 path.
- singles: the other scenes, once each, so the library looks lived-in.

Verified with the app's own engine on the desktop before pushing anything:
22 images -> 2 groups (PERCEPTUAL 14 copies, EXACT 2 copies) with the six
singles left alone. Regeneration is byte-identical, the output path resolves
from __file__ so it runs from any cwd, and nothing is written outside the repo.

demo-photos/ is git-ignored, like fixtures/ and store-assets/raw-screenshots/.
STORE_LISTING.md documents the library, why the headline group has a target
size, the MediaProvider scan_file recipe and the cleanup step; ROADMAP, README
and the release checklist point at it.
2026-10-13 23:34:12 +02:00

222 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Foto Dup Finder
A fast, **ad-free**, **fully offline** Android app that finds and removes duplicate
and near-duplicate photos. Built as a direct answer to the slow, ad-laden cleanup
tools that ship with many phones.
Nothing ever leaves the device: the app declares no network permission, contains no
analytics and needs no account.
## Features
- **Two kinds of duplicates**
- *Exact* — byte-identical copies, found with a cheap size/head/tail signature
followed by a full SHA-256.
- *Near* — resized, recompressed or lightly edited versions, found with a 64-bit
perceptual difference hash (`dHash`) plus a Hamming-distance threshold.
- **Tiered, parallel pipeline**: only plausible candidates get a full hash, and the
work is spread across all CPU cores.
- **Persistent index** so a re-scan only touches new or changed files.
- **Safe deletion** through the system consent dialog
(`MediaStore.createDeleteRequest`) or the system trash (`createTrashRequest`).
The app never requests `MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE`.
- **Two-step cleanup**: removing a row only *stages* it (the row disappears instantly,
nothing is deleted); one **Apply** then performs the removal, so Android asks for a
single confirmation for the whole batch instead of one per group.
- **Sensible defaults**: “select all but best” keeps the largest (then newest) copy
of each group.
- **Android 14+ partial photo access** handled explicitly, with a clear prompt to
upgrade to full access.
## Tech stack
| Area | Choice |
|---|---|
| Language | Kotlin 2.4.10 (using AGP 9 *built-in Kotlin*) |
| UI | Jetpack Compose, BOM 2026.06.01, Material 3 |
| Build | Gradle 9.3.1, Android Gradle Plugin 9.1.0 |
| Image loading | Coil 3.5.0 |
| Storage | MediaStore read + a small SQLite hash cache |
| SDK levels | `compileSdk`/`targetSdk` 36, `minSdk` 26 |
`targetSdk` is 36 because Google Play requires new apps and updates to target
Android 16 (API 36) from 31 August 2026.
> **Version note:** the Compose BOM is pinned to 2026.06.01 (Compose 1.11.4) and
> Coil to 3.5.0, because the next releases require `compileSdk 37`, which AGP 9.1.0
> does not support yet. Bump both together once a newer AGP lands.
## Project layout
```
app/src/main/java/de/softwareapp_hb/fotodup/finder/
├── core/ Pure-Kotlin duplicate engine (no Android imports!)
│ ├── Hashing.kt SHA-256 + cheap size/head/tail signature
│ ├── PerceptualHash.kt 64-bit dHash + Hamming distance
│ ├── DuplicateGrouper.kt exact + perceptual grouping (union-find)
│ ├── DuplicatePolicy.kt Exact / Balanced / Aggressive thresholds
│ └── …
├── data/ MediaStore access, hashing, permissions, SQLite index, deletion
├── domain/ ScanEngine (tiered pipeline) + progress/result models
└── ui/ Compose theme, scanner screen, ViewModel, components
app/src/test/java/… JVM unit tests for the core engine
```
`core/` deliberately has **no Android dependencies**, so the trickiest logic
(hashing, perceptual hashing, grouping) is covered by fast JVM tests.
## Building
Prerequisites:
- JDK 17+ (JDK 25 verified)
- Android SDK with `platforms;android-36` and `build-tools;36.0.0`
```bash
# Tell Gradle where the SDK lives (this file is git-ignored)
echo "sdk.dir=$HOME/Android/Sdk" > local.properties
./gradlew :app:assembleDebug # debug APK
./gradlew :app:testDebugUnitTest # JVM unit tests for the engine
./gradlew :app:lintDebug # Android Lint
./gradlew :app:assembleRelease # R8-minified release APK
./gradlew :app:bundleRelease # Play-ready .aab
```
### Installing on a device
```bash
adb install -r app/build/outputs/apk/debug/app-debug.apk
```
## How detection works
```
MediaStore query
│
▼
1. quick signature = SHA-256(size + first & last 32 KB)
│ bucket by (size, signature)
▼
2. full SHA-256 only for buckets with 2+ members → EXACT duplicates
│
▼
3. perceptual fingerprint, both from ONE decode → NEAR duplicates
· pHash: 32x32 grayscale → DCT → 8x8 low-frequency block → 64 bits
· RGB dHash: one 64-bit difference hash per colour channel
│ candidates via 8-bit band index; a pair must pass BOTH tests
│ the pHash cut is fitted per scan (see below), then union-find clusters
4. SQLite hash cache → the next scan only re-reads changed files
```
**Why two descriptors?** pHash sees luminance structure, the RGB hashes see colour
structure. A single Hamming threshold cannot hold out as a library grows, because
unrelated pairs accumulate with the square of the library size. Measured on the
benchmark harness, the widest pHash threshold with *zero* false pairs fell from 13
(120 images) to 5 (2 880 images) — so the app fits the cut to the library instead of
trusting a constant, and requires the colour structure to agree as well.
Sensitivity presets (both values are ceilings; the pHash one is adapted per scan):
| Policy | pHash ceiling | RGB ceiling | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exact copies only | – | – | byte-identical files, no decoding at all |
| Balanced (default) | 12 bits | 60 / 192 | the recommended setting |
| Aggressive | 18 bits | 84 / 192 | catches heavier re-edits |
Banding gives *exact* candidate recall for pHash distances up to 7 (see the comment in
`DuplicateGrouper`).
## Permissions
| Permission | Why it is needed |
|---|---|
| `READ_MEDIA_IMAGES` (API 33+) | read the photo library |
| `READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` (API ≤ 32) | same, on older devices |
| `READ_MEDIA_VISUAL_USER_SELECTED` (API 34+) | Android 14 "Selected photos" mode |
| `WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE` (**API ≤ 29 only**) | legacy delete path on Android 10 |
| `POST_NOTIFICATIONS` (API 33+) | shows the scan-progress notification (optional — the scan runs without it) |
| `FOREGROUND_SERVICE` + `FOREGROUND_SERVICE_DATA_SYNC` | keeps a long scan alive while the app is backgrounded |
Deletion on Android 11+ always goes through the system consent dialog. The app
never requests `MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE`.
### Scanning in the background
A scan is owned by `ScanController` (process-scoped, created by the Application), not
by the screen's ViewModel. While one is running, `ScanService` holds a `dataSync`
foreground service with a progress notification that has a **Cancel** action. So:
- leaving the app does not kill the scan,
- the result survives screen rotation and re-entry,
- the user always has a visible way to stop it.
When `POST_NOTIFICATIONS` is denied the scan still works; the notification is simply
not shown.
## Testing
`app/src/test` holds JVM unit tests for `core/`: SHA-256 test vectors, dHash bit
patterns, Hamming distance, exact/perceptual grouping, aspect-ratio filtering and
the reclaimable-bytes maths.
```bash
./gradlew :app:testDebugUnitTest
```
There is no instrumentation test and no emulator in this environment, so UI
behaviour is verified on a real device via `adb install` or Play internal testing.
## Releasing to Google Play
See [docs/PLAY_RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md](docs/PLAY_RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md) (signing, store
listing, Data Safety, release notes, rollout), [docs/STORE_LISTING.md](docs/STORE_LISTING.md)
(ready-to-paste listing copy plus the icon / feature graphic generators) and
[PRIVACY.md](PRIVACY.md).
The upload-ready graphics and screenshots live in [`store-assets/`](store-assets/).
`tools/make-store-assets.sh` and `tools/make-store-screenshots.sh` regenerate them from the
app's own icon vectors and from `adb` captures — always inside the repo, never in `$HOME`.
`python3 tools/make-demo-photos.py` draws the synthetic photo library the results screenshot is
captured over, so the listing never shows a real one.
User-visible changes are tracked in [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md); the Play "What's new"
text you type per release is separate and lives only in the Play Console.
## Localisation
All user-visible text lives in `app/src/main/res/values/strings.xml`, with proper `<plurals>`
where a count can be one, and both the screen and the progress notification resolve their
labels through `text/TextRes.kt`. **English is currently the only locale.**
Adding a language is then a file, not a refactor:
```
app/src/main/res/values-de/strings.xml # same keys, translated values
```
One caveat worth knowing: **Google Play's automatic translation translates your store
listing, not the app UI.** Translated UI text has to be supplied in `values-<locale>/`, by a
translator or by running the strings file through a translation service and reviewing it.
Byte units ("KB", "MB") and the duration formatter are intentionally left unlocalised.
## Known limitations
- Only **images** are scanned — videos are not supported yet.
- Near-duplicate detection ignores EXIF rotation, so an image saved physically
rotated by 90° will not match its original.
- The Aggressive policy may miss some pairs because of the banded candidate search.
- The very first scan of a huge library (50k+ photos) takes a while; later scans
reuse the hash index and are much faster.
## Roadmap
The project is tracked against a milestone plan (M0–M10). What is done, what remains,
the current release blockers and the candidate features all live in
[docs/ROADMAP.md](docs/ROADMAP.md).
## Licence
Proprietary — all rights reserved. Change this if you intend to open-source it.